Timetable of Classes
| Feb 7 |
General introduction:
- Essential philosophical skills

|
| Feb 9 |
Argument:
- Arguments: good, bad and ugly

|
| Feb 14 |
Universal healthcare:
- Why the US system is insane but not evil.

|
| Feb 16 |
Ethics: 
|
Feb 16
|
Assignment
|
| Feb 21 |
Sex & marriage
- Readings
- What's Wrong With Homosexuality. John Finnis. Pp.445-446.
- Homosexuality and Love. Martha Nussbaum. Pp.447-448.
|
| Feb 23 |
Gay marriage
- Reading
- The Debate Over Marriage. Jeffrey Jordan. On Sakai@UD
- In class group work
- Develop a challenge to Jordan's argument.
|
| Feb 28 |
New reproductive technologies
- Reading
- Choosing Future People. Mark Greene. On Sakai@UD.
|
| Mar 1 |
Selection for Disability:
- Reading
- Everworse: What's Wrong With Selecting for Disability. Mark Greene & Steven Augello. On Sakai@UD
|
| Mar 6 |
In-Class Group Assignment 1
Write an explanation of the non-identity problem using an example from environmental ethics
Max 300 words
- In-Class Group Assignment
- Groups are assigned and the assignment is completed in class.
- Submit in class via Sakai@UD, or by handing in a legible paper version.
- One submission per group is acceptable. The submitted document should state the group number and the names of all authors who actually contributed.
- It is the responsiblity of every group member to ensure that all participants are credited and that the submission goes through (make sure you see the confirmation page).
- If you are not in class, you will need to make an on-time, individual submission.
- Before class
- Please think about how to make an effective contribution to a group project.
- Review the relevant instructions for the assignment on the assessment page.
- Refresh your memory of relevant sources.
- Do any additional background research that might help with the project.
- Come prepared to contribute.
- Peer evaluations
- Please take note of each group member's contribution and be ready to submit online peer evaluations as requested.
|
| Mar 8 |
Abortion background
- Reading
- Chapter 8 Intro. Pp.161-173.
|
Mar 10
11:55pm |
Deadline:
- Submit Group Assignment 1
|
Mar 11
11:55pm |
Deadline:
|
| Mar 13 |
Personhood and potential:
- Reading
- Why Abortion is Immoral. Don Marquis. Pp.192-204.
|
| Mar 15 |
Rights and persons:
- Reading
- A Defense of Abortion. Judith Jarvis Thomson. Pp.173-183.
|
| Mar 20 |
Environment 
- Reading
- Chapter 14 Intro. Pp.498-507.
|
| Mar 22 |
Environment
- Reading
- Environmental Justice. James P Sterba. Pp.535-545.
|
Mar 23
5am |
Deadline:
|
| Apr 3 |
War:
- Readings
- Chapter 16 Intro. Pp.608-616.
- Humanitatian Intervention: Some Doubts. Burleigh Wilkins. Pp.669-675.
|
| Apr 5 |
Torture:
- Reading
- Torture, Morality, and Law. Jeff McMahan. On Sakai@UD.
|
Apr 9
5am |
Deadline:
|
| Apr 10 |
In-Class Group Assignment 2
Write an abstract of
Torture, Morality, and Law. Jeff McMahan.
Max 200 words
- In-Class Group Assignment
- Groups are assigned and the assignment is completed in class.
- Submit in class via Sakai@UD, or by handing in a legible paper version.
- One submission per group is acceptable. The submitted document should state the group number and the names of all authors who actually contributed.
- It is the responsiblity of every group member to ensure that all participants are credited and that the submission goes through (make sure you see the confirmation page).
- If you are not in class, you will need to make an on-time, individual submission.
- Before class
- Please think about how to make an effective contribution to a group project.
- Review the relevant instructions for the assignment on the assessment page.
- Refresh your memory of relevant sources.
- Do any additional background research that might help with the project.
- Come prepared to contribute.
- Peer evaluations
- Please take note of each group member's contribution and be ready to submit online peer evaluations as requested.
|
Apr 10
In class |
Deadline:
- Submit Group Assignment 2.
|
| Apr 12 |
'The Intruder' - Affirmative action background:
|
| Apr 17 |
For & against affirmative action: 
- Reading
- Affirmative Action and Fairness. Robert K Fullinwider. Pp.463-467.
- The Case against Affirmative Action. Louis P Pojman. Pp.467-479.
|
| Apr 19 |
Heritability & race
- Reading
- How Heritability Misleads About Race. Ned Block (1995). Cognition 56: 99-128.
|
| Apr 24 |
In-Class Group Assignment 3:
Write a concise explanation of why having high heritability is not the same as being inherited.
Max 300 words.
- In-Class Group Assignment
- Groups are assigned and the assignment is completed in class.
- Submit in class via Sakai@UD, or by handing in a legible paper version.
- One submission per group is acceptable. The submitted document should state the group number and the names of all authors who actually contributed.
- It is the responsiblity of every group member to ensure that all participants are credited and that the submission goes through (make sure you see the confirmation page).
- If you are not in class, you will need to make an on-time, individual submission.
- Before class
- Please think about how to make an effective contribution to a group project.
- Review the relevant instructions for the assignment on the assessment page.
- Refresh your memory of relevant sources.
- Do any additional background research that might help with the project.
- Come prepared to contribute.
- Peer evaluations
- Please take note of each group member's contribution and be ready to submit online peer evaluations as requested.
|
Apr 24
In class |
Deadline:
- Submit Group Assignment 3.
|
| Apr 26 |
Animals
- Reading
- Duties to Animals. Immanuel Kant. Pp.597-598.
- All Animals Are Equal. Peter Singer. Pp.565-574.
|
Apr 30
5am |
Deadline:
|
| May 1 |
'Other' cultures
- Reading
on Sakai@UD - 'Resources'
- Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Lila Abu-Lughod
|
| May 3 |
In-Class Group Assignment 4: The Bad Argument Assignment
Hunt for bad arguments in the wild and bring a candidate or two to class.
NB: Mark will be in Georgetown, not in class, today. So, be especially sure you come to class prepared:
- Think ahead and ask any questions about the assignment ahead of time.
- Make sure you know which group you are in.
- Be at the usual place at the usual time for class, prepared to complete the assignment and vacate the room before the next lot arrive.
- In-Class Group Assignment
- Groups are assigned and the assignment is completed in class.
- Submit in class via Sakai@UD, or by handing in a legible paper version.
- One submission per group is acceptable. The submitted document should state the group number and the names of all authors who actually contributed.
- It is the responsiblity of every group member to ensure that all participants are credited and that the submission goes through (make sure you see the confirmation page).
- If you are not in class, you will need to make an on-time, individual submission.
- Before class
- Please think about how to make an effective contribution to a group project.
- Review the relevant instructions for the assignment on the assessment page.
- Refresh your memory of relevant sources.
- Do any additional background research that might help with the project.
- Come prepared to contribute.
- Peer evaluations
- Please take note of each group member's contribution and be ready to submit online peer evaluations as requested.
|
May 3
In class |
Deadline:
- Submit Group Assignment 4.
|
| May 8 |
Libertarianism & Global Justice
- Reading
- The Entitlement Theory of Justice. Robert Nozick. Pp.771-779.
|
| May 10 |
Utilitarianism & Global Justice
- Reading
- Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Peter Singer. Pp.797-803.
|
| May 15 |
Review: come with your questions about the final quiz. |
May 20
2:47am |
Deadline:
- Final Quiz on Sakai@UD
- Your score for the final quiz may not be dropped, even if it is your lowest score.
|